The following paragraph is advice to health professionals regarding the new experimental vaccine which has not had formal approval which they acknowledge on their site.
“Vaccine hesitancy, particularly around COVID-19 vaccines, exists among all populations. When communicating with patients it is extremely important to underscore the general safety of vaccines and emphasize the fact that no steps were skipped in the development and evaluation of COVID-19 vaccines.How long does it normally take to develop a vaccine intended for wide scale use? Clearly to a layman like myself this is a blatant lie.
This can be done by briefly highlighting the safety requirements of vaccines, and ongoing safety monitoring even after vaccines are made available. The following are some messages to consider using when discussing COVID-19 vaccines with patients:
Vaccines are one of the greatest public health achievements of the 20th century. Before the widespread use of vaccines, people routinely died from infectious diseases, several of which have since been eradicated thanks to robust immunization programs.Yet an other propaganda statement from the WHO who are corrupt and lead by a terrorist and funded by Bill Gates who loves “family planning”. (Eugenics)
Several vaccines have safely been given to pregnant and lactating individuals for decadesI call bullshit on this one. So what about the numerous studies around sudden infant death and numerous neurological affects like autism?
The rigor of COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials with regards to monitoring safety and efficacy meet the same high standards and requirements as with a typical vaccine approval process.Impossible. Just not possible. By saying this does it mean it is true?
While there has been a worldwide attempt to develop COVID-19 vaccines rapidly, this does not mean that any safety standards have been relaxed. In fact, there are additional safety monitoring systems to track and monitor these vaccines, including real-time assessment.I find this offensive to my limited intelligence! There is not such thing as “rapid” in something so important.
Side effects such as influenza-like-illness can be expected with these vaccines, however this is a normal reaction as the body develops antibodies to protect itself against COVID-19.Oh but this is an RNA vaccine isn’t it? That is not how it works. This is the first of its kind.
COVID-19 vaccines cannot cause COVID-19 infection. It is important not to be dissuaded by these side effects, because in order to get the maximum protection against COVID-19, patients need two doses of the vaccine.Cannot? Then why did patients in Israel test positive?
Source: Wion News
More than 12,400 people have tested positive for coronavirus in Israel after getting inoculated by the Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine, including 69 people who had taken their second jab.
Israel’s health ministry tested 189,000 people after they vaccinated by Pfizer’s vaccine and 6.6 per cent of the people still tested positive for COVID-19.
- Safety monitoring continues well beyond the EUA administration.”
May I ask what monitoring has anything to do with safety after someone has had the vaccine? What can they “undo” the vaccine by pressing an “undo” vaccination button? Too late then. It should have been developed over a decade like most other vaccines hey?
Something from the Pfzer website –
What can you share about the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women?
We recognize that developing a potential vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 for broad use is critically important to combat the pandemic. In line with standard research practice, pregnant women were not enrolled in our trial, so available data on the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine administered to pregnant women are limited.
However, a recent study in JAMA Network Open compared the outcomes of pregnancies in women that have / have not had SARS-CoV-2 infection, which showed that SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy was not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes.
So the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists is telling doctors to advise patients that the vaccine is OK if you a pregnant but Pfizer did not test it on pregnant ladies so how the hell do they know it is OK?
Clearly you can that Covid-19 does not cause issues with pregnacy however ACOG says this –
“Available data suggest that symptomatic pregnant patients with COVID-19 are at increased risk of more severe illness compared with nonpregnant peers “
Which is it then?
I got all that just from an hour of research and I have already seen so many inconsistencies. OH sorry but I am not qualified to make a conclusion am I? But I can read English OK and what I see is they want pregnant woman to be vaccinated even though no testing has been done with these experimental vaccines by their own admission –
“COVID-19 vaccine development and regulatory approval are rapidly progressing. Thus, information and recommendations will evolve as more data are collected about these vaccines and their use in specific populations.“
You see that English there? Rapidly, evolving and more data? So they admit they do not have all the data and they are experimenting on us and using that data as it rapidly evolves!